Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04436159
Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia.
Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia. Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 70 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Karolinska University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Short-term follow up after surgery of para-esophageal hernia comparing two different types of fundoplication
Detailed description
Laparoscopic para-esophageal hernia (PEH) repair has been established as a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic patients. Today, most surgeons agree that a fundoplication should be included in the hiatal reconstruction in order to reduce the risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and hernia recurrence. However, what type of wrap that should be recommend is yet to be determined. One might argue that the overall durability and effectiveness of a partial fundoplication in the control of reflux might be less reliable than a total wrap, but on the contrary, the latter carries the risk of inducing a pseudoachalasia similar situation in PEH patients. We therefore designed a double blind randomized clinical trial in which patients with symptomatic paraesophageal hernia to receive either a posterior partial (Toupet) or total (Nissen) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair. Six months follow up with questionnaires, 24-hour pH monitoring and radiology after surgery of para-esophageal hernia with addition of total fundoplication vs posterial partial fundoplication. Dysphagia Scores; Ogilvie dysphagia score and Watson dysphagia score. Quality of Life; SF-36: physical and mental component scores. Time points: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Addition of 360 fundoplication after crural closure | A total fundoplication was constructed in which the right and left part of the wrap was brought together in front of, and slightly to the right of the esophagus, and sutured with three interrupted stitches of 2-0 unabsorbable sutures from the GEJ and cranially to attain a length between the top and bottom sutures of at the most 2 cm. At least one wrap suture included the esophageal muscle-wall. |
| PROCEDURE | Addition of 180 posterior fundoplication after crural closure | The wrap was pulled dorsally around the distal part of the esophagus and GEJ, which was encircled approximately 180-200 degrees. First, the wrap was anchored with Gore-tex sutures, dorsally to the left crus with 3 sutures and then to the right crus with another 3 sutures. Finally, the wrap was completed with 3-4 sutures, between the edges of the wrap and the right and left side of the esophageal wall, respectively. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-09-01
- Completion
- 2018-09-01
- First posted
- 2020-06-17
- Last updated
- 2021-09-02
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Sweden
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04436159. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.