NCT04418336

Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 60 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Mansoura University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: —
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.

Conditions

• Pilonidal Sinus

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique	Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique in sacrococcygeal Pilonidal sinus treatment

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-06-01
• Primary completion: 2021-06-01
• Completion: 2021-06-02
• First posted: 2020-06-05
• Last updated: 2020-06-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt