Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT04365010

Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloids in Septic Shock Adults

Effects of Low-chlorine Vs High-chlorine Crystalloid Solutions in Septic Shock Adults

Status
Unknown
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100 (estimated)
Sponsor
Southeast University, China · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Fluid resuscitation is an important treatment in septic shock patients, however whether crystalloid composition affects septic shock patients outcomes remains unclear. According to previous studies, low-chlorine crystalloids could significantly reduce the incidence of kidney injury and 30-day mortality compared with high-chlorine crystalloids in critically ill adults. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of low-chlorine crystalloids would result in a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE 30: overall incidence of death, new renal-replacement therapy, and persistent renal dysfunction) than high-chlorine crystalloids in septic shock adults.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGSodium Bicarbonate Ringer's InjectionFor each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.
DRUG0.9% Sodium Chloride InjectionFor each month of the trial, participating ICUs were assigned to use either Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection or 0.9% Saline for any intravenous administration of isotonic crystalloid. ICUs were randomly assigned to use Sodium Bicarbonate Ringer's Injection during even-numbered months and 0.9% Saline during odd-numbered months, or vice versa.

Timeline

Start date
2020-05-01
Primary completion
2021-09-01
Completion
2021-12-01
First posted
2020-04-28
Last updated
2020-04-28

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04365010. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.