Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT04310683
Natural Cycle or Stimulated Cycle Versus Hormone Replaced Cycle for Pre-eclampsia Rate
The Live Birth Rate in Natural Cycle or Stimulated Cycle Versus Hormone Replaced Cycle in Patients Undergoing Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 840 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Women's Hospital School Of Medicine Zhejiang University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 45 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Recent sutdies indicate that the existence of corpus lutein in the ovary is a key point to prevent preeclampsia, and patients undergoing FET with hormone replaced cycle have no corpus lutein and the absence of corpus lutein significantly increases the risk of preeclampsia in these patients. We aim to conduct a single center randomized trial study to compare the preeclampsia rate between the natural cycle and the hormone replaced cycle in patients undergoing FET.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | natural cycle for endometrium preparation | patients will not use oral contraceptive drugs |
| OTHER | hormone replaced cycle for endometrium preparation | patients will receive oral contraceptive drugs for menstruation before embryo transfer |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-11-10
- Primary completion
- 2021-12-10
- Completion
- 2022-03-10
- First posted
- 2020-03-17
- Last updated
- 2020-03-17
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04310683. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.