Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT04295187

Health of Pessary Versus Progesterone Supplement for Preventing Preterm Birth Children

Physical, Mental and Motor Development of Children Born to Mothers Treated With Pessary or Progesterone Supplement for Preventing Preterm Birth

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
529 (actual)
Sponsor
Mỹ Đức Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
1 Month – 66 Months
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

To give strong recommendations on the efficacy and safety of vaginal progesterone versus cervical cerclage, we conduct this study to investigate the physical and mental development of children from vaginal progesterone versus cervical cerclage. Based on our research (Dang et al., 2019), the twin pregnancies with cervical lengths less than 38mm were randomly assigned to receive vaginal progesterone or cervical cerclage, which leads to the similarity in characteristics of these two groups. Hence, the result of analyzing these offsprings would be preciously valuable.

Detailed description

Preterm birth (PB) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Twin pregnancies and short cervical length are two high-risk factors of PB. Generally, in singleton pregnancies with short cervical length below 25 mm, or with a history of preterm birth, preventive measures of PB are vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage. The cervical pessary is also being investigated for effectiveness in PB prevention in different populations. However, the effective preventive methods for PB has not been identified up to now in twin pregnancies with short cervical length. In our research, the results showed that the preterm birth rate before 34 weeks in the cervical pessary group was lower than the progesterone group (16% vs 22%, RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46 - 1.18). The perinatal outcomes were also better in the cervical pessary group than in the progesterone group (19% vs 27%, RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.43 - 0.93). The cost of the cervical pessary method was also significantly lower than the vaginal progesterone method cost. Pessary insertion was also more convenient since it was only inserted once during pregnancy, compared to daily vaginal progesterone. Therefore, the cervical pessary may be an appropriate option for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a short cervix. However, besides these short-term outcomes, we need to pay more attention to the longer-term issues of both mothers and infants. Some evidence up to now has demonstrated that both these two methods are safe with no impact on physical, mental, and motor development of children up to 3 years old and even in older children. However, such evidence is still rare. Also, there hasn't been any study evaluating the impact, if any, of these two PB preventive methods.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHERDevelopmental score according to The Ages & Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition - ASQ®-3Ages \& Stages Questionnaires®, Third Edition (ASQ®-3) is a developmental screening tool designed for use by early educators and health care professionals. It relies on parents as experts, is easy-to-use, family-friendly and creates the snapshot needed to catch delays and celebrate milestones.
OTHERPhysical development and General HealthPhysical development and General health examination
OTHERDevelopmental Red flagsDevelopmental Red flags Questionnaires

Timeline

Start date
2020-03-06
Primary completion
2020-07-15
Completion
2020-12-09
First posted
2020-03-04
Last updated
2021-02-24

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Vietnam

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04295187. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.