Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Recruiting

RecruitingNCT04273607

Anticoagulation-free VV ECMO for Acute Respiratory Failure

Anticoagulation-free VV ECMO for Acute Respiratory Failure: A Pilot Safety and Feasibility Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40 (estimated)
Sponsor
Damian Ratano · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Currently international experts recommend therapeutic anticoagulation for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Reports and case series suggest that the absence of therapeutic anticoagulation is safe for VV-ECMO. No randomized control trials have assessed this. The aim of this pilot study is to assess safety and feasibility of an "anticoagulation-free strategy" for veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) in Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Detailed description

Although anticoagulation targets and monitoring strategies vary around the world, the current practice is still to anticoagulate patients on ECMO, mostly with UFH. However, the use of heparin coated circuits has changed their thrombogenicity. Preliminary data suggest that a low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) strategy is non-inferior to a therapeutic dose UFH. Indeed, in daily practice, when a patient on ECMO has severe bleeding complications, UFH is often stopped until the hemorrhagic issue is under control, sometimes for days. This has led some to hypothesize that anticoagulation might not be necessary for VV-ECMO, and a few case series report little to no increase in adverse events as a result. There are currently no randomized controlled trials comparing anticoagulation to no anticoagulation for patients supported with ECMO. Anticoagulation is, for physiological reasons, less necessary during VV-ECMO than VA-ECMO and this is the reason why our pilot study will focus on VV-ECMO only. Whereas the whole ECMO device is identical for both configurations, the risk of systemic embolization (e.g., stroke) and its severe complications is much higher in VA-ECMO where blood is reinjected directly into the systemic arterial system. Moreover, in the presence of severely decreased left ventricular function requiring VA-ECMO, the risk of left ventricular thrombus is very high and requires anticoagulation. During VV-ECMO, the risk of systemic embolization is low because the whole circuit is on the right side of the heart and relatively preserved biventricular function is needed to perform VV-ECMO The hypothesis is that VV-ECMO is safe and feasible without therapeutic anticoagulation for adults with ARDS. The objectives of this study is to assess, through a pilot study, the safety and feasibility of an "anticoagulation free strategy" for veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) in acute respiratory failure

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGSubcutaneous HeparinThe intervention group will receive prophylactic heparin instead of standard of care therapeutic intravenous heparin

Timeline

Start date
2022-09-01
Primary completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2027-01-30
First posted
2020-02-18
Last updated
2026-01-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04273607. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.