Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT04257851
Is Theophylline More Effective Than Sumatriptan in the Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache
Is Theophylline More Effective Than Sumatriptan in the Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Damanhour Teaching Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 21 Years – 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral theophylline versus oral sumatriptan in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Background: PDPH is the most frequent complication of procedures associated with dural puncture for spinal anesthesia or following accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. Since invasive treatments have known complications, pharmacologic management may be preferable. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase four clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients presented with PDPH at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each); group T, received oral theophylline, and group S, received oral sumatriptan.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Theophylline Anhydrous Oral Tablet | Theophylline tablet (150 mg/12h) |
| DRUG | Sumatriptan Succinate Oral Tablet | Sumatriptan tablet (25 mg/12h) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2020-02-15
- Primary completion
- 2021-05-15
- Completion
- 2021-05-15
- First posted
- 2020-02-06
- Last updated
- 2021-06-03
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT04257851. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.