NCT04178083

Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.

Comparison of Postoperative Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Patients With Uterine Prolapse.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 120 (actual)
• Sponsor: Diyarbakir Women's and Children's Diseases Hospital · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 70 Years
• Healthy volunteers: —

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)

Detailed description

The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.) We will evaluate Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative System (POP-Q), Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQoL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), routine gynecologic USG, failure, complication, operation time .

Conditions

• Pelvic Organ Prolapse
• Laparoscopy

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DIAGNOSTIC_TEST	medical examination	medical examination

Timeline

• Start date: 2020-01-01
• Primary completion: 2020-12-30
• Completion: 2020-12-30
• First posted: 2019-11-26
• Last updated: 2021-01-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Turkey (Türkiye)