NCT04153461

Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones.

Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones. A Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 210 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Mansoura University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The EUA Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel meta-analysis suggest that mPNL is at least as efficacious and safe as sPNL for the removal of renal calculi. However, the quality of the evidence was poor, drawn mainly from small studies, the majority of which were single-arm case series, and only one of which was RCT. The risks of bias and confounding were high, highlighting the need for more reliable data from RCTs. So, the Panel recommended for more clinical research . The aim of this study is to compare between PNL and mPNL through a randomized controlled trial.

Conditions

• Urolithiasis
• Stone;Renal
• Nephrolithiasis
• PNL
• PCNL
• NEPHROLITHOTOMY
• MINIPERC

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY	MINIPERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY USING NEPHROSCOPY 15 FR, LASER DUSTING OF THE STONE, NEPHROSTOMY TUBE 12 FIXATION
PROCEDURE	STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY	PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY USING NEPHROSCOPY 24 FR, ULTRASOUND OR LITHOCLAST DISINTEGRATION OF THE STONE AND FORCEPS EXTRACTION OF THE FRAGMENTS, NEPHROSTOMY TUBE 22 FIXATION

Timeline

• Start date: 2019-05-01
• Primary completion: 2021-05-01
• Completion: 2021-05-01
• First posted: 2019-11-06
• Last updated: 2019-11-13

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt