Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03997006
Is Aminophylline More Effective Than Neostigmine/Atropine Mixture in the Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache
Is Aminophylline More Effective Than Neostigmine/Atropine Mixture in the Treatment of Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Damanhour Teaching Hospital · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 21 Years – 50 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of IV aminophylline versus IV neostigmine/atropine mixture in the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Background: PDPH is the most frequent complication of procedures associated with dural puncture for spinal anesthesia or following accidental dural puncture during epidural anesthesia. Since invasive treatments have known complications, pharmacologic management may be preferable. Patients and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase four clinical trial; carried out on 60 patients presented with PDPH at our hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups (30 patients each); group A, received IV aminophylline, and group NA, received IV neostigmine/atropine mixture.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | IV Aminophylline | IV Aminophylline (100 mg/8h) |
| DRUG | IV Neostigmine Methylsulfate + Atropine Sulphate | IV Neostigmine/Atropine mixture (20 μg/kg Neostigmine + 10 μg/kg Atropine)/8h |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2019-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-01-01
- Completion
- 2020-01-01
- First posted
- 2019-06-25
- Last updated
- 2020-02-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03997006. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.