Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03735173
Comparing the Outcome of Cemented All-Polyethylene Pegged vs. Keeled Components Through a Subscapularis Tenotomy or a Subscapularis Peel
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Outcome of Cemented All-Polyethylene Pegged vs. Keeled Components Through a Subscapularis Tenotomy or a Subscapularis Peel
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 4 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Mayo Clinic · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Participants who choose to participate in this study, will either have their tendon repaired to tendon, so-called tenotomy repair, or tendon repaired to bone, so-called peel repair.
Conditions
- Arthropathy Shoulder
- Shoulder Pain
- Shoulder Osteoarthritis
- Shoulder Arthritis
- Shoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other Conditions
- Necrosis of Bone
- Arthritis
- Inflammatory Arthritis
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | ReUnion TSA, pegged design | ReUnion total shoulder arthroplasty system, pegged design |
| PROCEDURE | ReUnion TSA, keeled design | ReUnion total shoulder arthroplasty system, keeled design |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2018-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-05-07
- Completion
- 2021-05-07
- First posted
- 2018-11-08
- Last updated
- 2021-08-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03735173. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.