NCT03209076

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Study

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 120 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil · Other Government
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 70 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Prospective randomized trial comparing robotic versus laparoscopic Low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Primary endpoint: Compare urinary dysfunction between robotic and laparoscopic approach.

Detailed description

Prospective randomized trial comparing robotic versus laparoscopic Low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The Aim of the study is to compare two surgical approaches (robotic versus laparoscopic) for rectal cancer treatment regarding functional outcomes (sexual and urinary dysfunctions), quality of life, post operative outcomes and oncologic outcomes. Patients with the diagnosis of T3 mid and low rectal cancer will be randomized to robotic or laparoscopic procedure after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Quality of life questionnaires and Urodynamic test will be applied before and after the surgical procedures.

Conditions

• Rectal Neoplasms
• Sexual Dysfunction
• Urinary Incontinence
• Quality of Life

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Robotic	Robotic low anterior resection
PROCEDURE	Laparoscopic	Laparoscopic low anterior resection

Timeline

• Start date: 2018-02-01
• Primary completion: 2020-06-01
• Completion: 2020-12-01
• First posted: 2017-07-06
• Last updated: 2019-10-16

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Brazil