Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT03205540

Epidural Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block in Bilateral TKA

Comparison Efficacy of Analgesic Techniques: Continuous Epidural Analgesia Versus Bilateral Single-shot Adductor Canal Blocks in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70 (actual)
Sponsor
Mahidol University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study evaluates postoperative analgesic efficacy within 48 hours between epidural analgesia and single-shot bilateral adductor canal blocks in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Half of participants will be received continuous epidural analgesia, while other half of participants will be received single-shot bilateral adductor canal blocks.

Detailed description

Continuous epidural analgesia is effective postoperative pain control but it has some limitations in patients with hypotension, concurrent anticoagulants, technical difficulty, urinary retention. Adductor canal block is less invasive than continuous epidural analgesia. It provides effective analgesia for total knee arthroplasty and preserves quadriceps muscle strength.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREContinuous epidural blockContinuous epidural block at level L2-3 or L3-4 with 0.0625% bupivacaine + fentanyl 2 mcg/ml infusion epidurally 5 ml/hr for 48 hours postoperatively.
PROCEDUREBilateral single-shot bilateral adductor canal blocksBilateral single-shot adductor canal blocks, ultrasound guidance, with 0.33% bupivacaine 15 ml on each side.

Timeline

Start date
2017-08-01
Primary completion
2021-01-30
Completion
2021-05-01
First posted
2017-07-02
Last updated
2021-05-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Thailand

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03205540. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.