Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT03205540
Epidural Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block in Bilateral TKA
Comparison Efficacy of Analgesic Techniques: Continuous Epidural Analgesia Versus Bilateral Single-shot Adductor Canal Blocks in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 70 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Mahidol University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study evaluates postoperative analgesic efficacy within 48 hours between epidural analgesia and single-shot bilateral adductor canal blocks in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Half of participants will be received continuous epidural analgesia, while other half of participants will be received single-shot bilateral adductor canal blocks.
Detailed description
Continuous epidural analgesia is effective postoperative pain control but it has some limitations in patients with hypotension, concurrent anticoagulants, technical difficulty, urinary retention. Adductor canal block is less invasive than continuous epidural analgesia. It provides effective analgesia for total knee arthroplasty and preserves quadriceps muscle strength.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Continuous epidural block | Continuous epidural block at level L2-3 or L3-4 with 0.0625% bupivacaine + fentanyl 2 mcg/ml infusion epidurally 5 ml/hr for 48 hours postoperatively. |
| PROCEDURE | Bilateral single-shot bilateral adductor canal blocks | Bilateral single-shot adductor canal blocks, ultrasound guidance, with 0.33% bupivacaine 15 ml on each side. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2021-01-30
- Completion
- 2021-05-01
- First posted
- 2017-07-02
- Last updated
- 2021-05-26
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Thailand
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03205540. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.