Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03130855
Comparison Between Efficiency of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques Using Articaine 4% 1:100000
Buccal Infiltration Technique Compared to Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Technique for Alleviation of Intraoperative Pain During Pulpal Treatment of Mandibular Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 48 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Cairo University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 6 Years – 8 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
This split mouth randomized control trial is designed as to compare the effectiveness of the buccal infiltration technique with the gold standard inferior alveolar nerve block in anesthetizing mandibular second primary molars to undergoing pulpal treatment. patient will be videotaped during pulpal treatment of their teeth and an accessing pain will be through an objective pain scale (SEM scale), (sound-eye-motor scale). the patient will be asked to fill in a subjective Wong Baker pain scale for the pain suffered during injecting the local anesthetic agent in both techniques.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine | an anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution |
| DRUG | buccal infiltration with 4% articaine | anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-05-15
- Primary completion
- 2017-07-01
- Completion
- 2017-08-01
- First posted
- 2017-04-27
- Last updated
- 2017-05-10
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03130855. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.