NCT03053570

Study Comparing Pulmonary Vein Isolation With the Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Energy(Contact Force) in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) (Cryo Vs CF in PerAF)

Study Comparing Pulmonary Vein Isolation With the Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Energy(Contact Force) in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PerAF)

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 200 (estimated)
• Sponsor: China Cardiometabolic Registries · Network
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 75 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to perform a prospective, randomised study investigating the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon catheter ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation(contact force), in the treatment of persistent AF.

Detailed description

The hypotheses for this study is that cryothermal energy is as effective and safe as using radiofrequency energy in the treatment of persistent AF and is associated with a better long term outcome.

Conditions

• Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	Cryoballoon	use Cryoballoon to isolation the Pulmonary Vein
DEVICE	Radiofrequency Energy(Contact Force)	use Radiofrequency Energy(Contact Force) to isolation the Pulmonary Vein

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-03-01
• Primary completion: 2018-12-31
• Completion: 2018-12-31
• First posted: 2017-02-15
• Last updated: 2017-02-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China