Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03044925
Remote Magnetic Navigation-guided Ablation Versus Cryoablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RECREATION Study)
Remote Magnetic Navigation-guided Ablation Versus Cryoablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Controlled Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Ruijin Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Compare the safety and efficacy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Detailed description
1. Compare the efficacy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. 2. Compare the safety of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. 3. Compare the procedural parameters of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. 4. Compare the effects of amiodarone on recurrence after these two different ablation procedures.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Remote magnetic navigation | Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation guided by remote magnetic navigation |
| PROCEDURE | Cryoablation | Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation used by cryoballoon |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-12-31
- Completion
- 2020-12-31
- First posted
- 2017-02-07
- Last updated
- 2019-09-06
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03044925. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.