NCT03005145

Bacteremia Antibiotic Length Actually Needed for Clinical Effectiveness

Bacteremia Antibiotic Length Actually Needed for Clinical Effectiveness: Randomized Controlled Trial

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 3,622 (actual)
• Sponsor: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The World Health Organization, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (AMMI) Canada, and Health Canada have all declared antimicrobial resistance a global threat to health, based on rapidly increasing resistance rates and declining new drug development. Up to 30-50% of antibiotic use is inappropriate, and excessive durations of treatment are the greatest contributor to inappropriate use. Shorter duration treatment (≤7 days) has been shown in meta-analyses to be as effective as longer antibiotic treatment for a range of mild to moderate infections. A landmark trial in critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia showed that mortality and relapse rates were non-inferior in patients who received 8 vs 15 days of treatment. Similar adequately powered randomized trial evidence is lacking for the treatment of patients with bloodstream infections caused by a wide spectrum of organisms.

Detailed description

Bloodstream infections are a common and serious problem, increasing length of hospital stay by 2-3 weeks, adding $25,000-40,000 in excess hospital costs, and tripling the risk of death. At the same time, antibiotic overuse is also a common and serious problem, in that 30-50% of antibiotic use is unnecessary or inappropriate, and results in avoidable drug side effects such as kidney failure, Clostridioides difficile infection, increased costs, and spiralling antibiotic resistance rates. The greatest contributor to antibiotic overuse is excessive durations of treatment. Extensive research has demonstrated that shorter duration antibiotic treatment (less or equal to 7 days) is as effective as longer duration treatment for a variety of infectious diseases, but this question has not been directly studied in the setting of bloodstream infection. BALANCE team's systematic review of the medical literature, national survey of Canadian infectious diseases and critical care physicians, multicentre retrospective study and BALANCE pilot RCT, all support the need for a randomized controlled trial comparing shorter (7 days) versus longer (14 days) antibiotic therapy for bloodstream infections. Prior to performing the main trial, Investigators completed a pilot trial in ICU patients to establish the feasibility of the research design, and to optimize the definitive trial. Investigators also completed a pilot trial of non-ICUs patients to test the feasibility, compare the patient population in two settings and to assess the reasonableness of expanding the main BALANCE Trial to non-ICU wards. The overall recruitment rate of the non-ICU ward pilot RCT exceeded the recruitment rate in the BALANCE ICU pilot RCT with a protocol adherence of 90%. The results of this pilot were used to estimate the necessary sample size recalculation, after merging the BALANCE ward trial with the BALANCE main trial, with the principle of maintaining an equal to smaller non-inferiority margin by the trial's completion. With the completion of this pilot RCT, the eligibility criteria for the BALANCE trial are also modified to broaden the inclusion of all bacteremic patients admitted to hospital. By defining the duration of treatment for bloodstream infections, BALANCE research program will help maximize the clinical cure of individual patients, while minimizing their risk of drug side effects, C. difficile, and antibiotic resistance. Since this intervention would require no new technology, and would reduce (rather than increase) health care costs, it would offer immediate benefits to patients and the healthcare system. The BALANCE RCT will randomize hospitalized patients with bloodstream infection to 7 versus 14 days of adequate antibiotic treatment; the antibiotic drugs, doses, routes and interval will be left to the discretion of the treating team. Although placebo controls are not feasible, prolonged allocation concealment to day 7 will be used to mitigate selection bias. The primary analysis will assess whether 7 days is associated with non-inferior 90 day survival as compared to 14 days of treatment. Participants from the vanguard BALANCE pilot RCTs will be included in the BALANCE main RCT, and participating Canadian sites will continue to enrol patients. BALANCE international collaborators include New Zealand, Australia, Saudi Arabia, the United States, Israel and Switzerland.

Conditions

• Bacteremia
• Intensive Care
• Critically Ill
• Sepsis
• Mortality
• Antimicrobial

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
OTHER	7 days of adequate antibiotic treatment	The choice of treatment including type, dose, route and interval of antibiotic will be left at the discretion of treating team as long as it is appropriate for the bacteremia
OTHER	14 days of adequate antibiotic treatment.	The choice of treatment including type, dose, route and interval of antibiotic will be left at the discretion of treating team as long as it is appropriate for the bacteremia

Timeline

• Start date: 2017-02-24
• Primary completion: 2023-05-05
• Completion: 2023-08-03
• First posted: 2016-12-29
• Last updated: 2024-02-29

Locations

68 sites across 7 countries: United States, Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland