Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT03003559
HFNC vs Nasal Cannula in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation
Comparison of High Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Cannula in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation(AECOPD)
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 328 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- China-Japan Friendship Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
For AECOPD patients, only 8% patients ventilated by noninvasive and invasive positive pressure ventilation. Nasal cannula is the most common pattern of oxygen therapy in mild AECOPD. As a low flow oxygen therapy, nasal cannula has many disadvantages.Therefore, we design a randomized controlled trial(RCT)to explore whether HFNC would be better than nasal cannula to prevent the aggravation of respiratory failure and endotracheal intubation in mild AECOPD.
Detailed description
For AECOPD patients, most of patients don't need respiratory support, only 8% patients ventilated by noninvasive and invasive positive pressure ventilation. Nasal cannula is the most common pattern of oxygen therapy in mild AECOPD. As a low flow oxygen therapy, nasal cannula has many disadvantages: discomfort, low humidity and unstable fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) in inspiratory gas. Therefore, we design a RCT to explore whether HFNC would be better than nasal cannula to prevent the aggravation of respiratory failure and endotracheal intubation in mild AECOPD.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | High flow nasal cannula | High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a new emerging noninvasive respiratory support technology, which mainly includes high flow (15-60 L/min) device, heating humidification device and nasal cannula for high flow. A large number of physiological studies confirmed that HFNC has the following critical physiological effects: promoting airway humidification, improving tolerance of treatment, reducing the physiological dead space on the upper respiratory tract, producing a certain level of positive end expiratory pressure (2-7 cmH2O), decreasing the work of breathing and so on. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2017-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2020-12-01
- Completion
- 2020-12-01
- First posted
- 2016-12-28
- Last updated
- 2020-01-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT03003559. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.