NCT02800512

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Randomized Trial

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 112 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Loma Linda University · Academic / Other
• Sex: Female
• Age: 18 Years – 100 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of R-SCP versus HUSLS for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Detailed description

To compare the effectiveness of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Both surgeries are standard of care and are equally and widely used throughout the country with well known safety and efficacy.

Conditions

• Pelvic Organ Prolapse
• Cystocele
• Rectocele
• Enterocele

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Robotic sacrocolpopexy	Sacrocolpopexy is a procedure to surgically correct vaginal vault prolapse where mesh is used to hold the vagina in the correct anatomical position. Robotic assistance is a minimally invasive method to perform this abdominal procedure.
PROCEDURE	high uterosacral ligament suspension	Utilizing uterosacral ligaments to support the vaginal cuff can be performed vaginally-by passing sutures bilaterally through the uterosacral ligaments. near the level of the ischial spine. HUSLS is a vaginal minimally invasive procedure for POP.

Timeline

• Start date: 2016-12-01
• Primary completion: 2025-12-01
• Completion: 2025-12-01
• First posted: 2016-06-15
• Last updated: 2025-01-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States