Trials / Terminated
TerminatedNCT02763813
Comparison of Two Oral Appliances in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Comparison of a Retention Type and Propulsion Type Oral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Status
- Terminated
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 4 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hopital Foch · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Monocentric comparative group study comparing the efficacy and short-term tolerance of a propulsion type oral appliance (Herbst) with a retention type device (ORM) used in the treatment of sleep apnea syndrome. The investigators hypothesized both appliances would be equally effective and tolerated.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Herbst (propulsion type oral appliance) | Oral appliance |
| DEVICE | Retention type appliance (ORM) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-12-01
- Completion
- 2013-02-01
- First posted
- 2016-05-05
- Last updated
- 2016-10-14
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02763813. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.