Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02751281
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney Stones
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 180 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which type of percutaneous nephrolithotomy is better in large kidney stones
Detailed description
While there are several retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy of different lithotripter in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, there are few prospective studies in this regard. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Ultrasonic versus pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large kidney stones.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy | Pneumatic percutaneous nephrolithotomy is type of surgery that we use pneumatic lithotripter to treat kidney stone |
| PROCEDURE | Ultra-sonic percutaneous nephrolithotomy | Ultra-sonic percutaneous nephrolithotomy is type of surgery that we use ultra-sonic lithotripter to treat kidney stone |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-04-01
- Completion
- 2016-04-01
- First posted
- 2016-04-26
- Last updated
- 2016-04-26
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02751281. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.