Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02714946
Laser Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Thyroid Nodules
Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ultrasound-guided Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 60 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Campus Bio-Medico University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus percutaneous laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of solid thyroid nodules.
Detailed description
Nodular thyroid disease is a common clinical problem whose prevalence increases with age and with a more widespread use of thyroid ultrasonography. Although most thyroid nodules are benign and need only periodic monitoring, some may require treatment for associated pressure and/or cosmetic symptoms. Although thyroid surgery is the main therapeutic approach for compressive thyroid nodules, it may be associated with several drawbacks. Long-term levothyroxine suppression treatment in elderly patients with large nodular goiters is unsatisfactory because it is ineffective. Furthermore, it is associated with adverse effects on bones and the cardiovascular system. Nonsurgical, minimally invasive treatment modalities such as percutaneous laser ablation (LA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been used to treat thyroid nodules. However no studies comparing LA and RFA have been published so far. Aims of the study 1. To evaluate whether LA and RFA cause a reduction ≥50% in the volume of thyroid nodules after 6 months and 1 year follow-up 2. To evaluate whether the features of thyroid nodules as evaluated by thyroid ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, power-doppler and core-biopsy influence LA and RFA outcomes 3. To evaluate changes in thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity after LA and RFA. 4. To evaluate differences between LA and RFA in terms of complications, side effects and tolerability. Patients will be recruited, treated and followed at Santa Maria Goretti Hospital in Latina, Italy, by physicians with expertise in LA and RFA. The scientific coordinator of this study is dr. Silvia Manfrini.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Percutaneous Laser Ablation | Single session with standardized approach: One or two fibers will be used for treatments including one to three illuminations with a fixed output power of 3 W, using the pullback technique. Energy for each emission will be 1200-1800J based on nodule volume. The treatment is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. |
| DEVICE | Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation | Single session with standardized approach: A radiofrequency generator and a 17-gauge, 15-cm electrode with a 1-cm active tip will be used. A transisthmic approach along the short axis of the nodule will be used and the nodules will be managed with the moving-shot technique. 60 W of radiofrequency outpower will be used for all nodules. The treatment is performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2016-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-09-01
- Completion
- 2020-01-01
- First posted
- 2016-03-22
- Last updated
- 2019-09-04
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Italy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02714946. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.