Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02625467
Treatment of Keratoconus With PALK Versus PK
Treatment of Keratoconus With Pachymetry Assisted Laser Keratoplasty (PALK) Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK)
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 28 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the visual results of patients with keratoconus treated with one of two techniques: penetrating keratoplasty (PK) vs. pachymetry and Excimer laser assisted lamellar keratoplasty (PALK).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Penetrating keratoplasty | Conventional Penetrating keratoplasty technique |
| PROCEDURE | Pachymetry and Excimer laser assisted lamellar keratoplasty | Ablation profile focusing on topography and pachymetry with Schwind Amaris excimer laser |
| DRUG | Treatment posterior to surgery | Fluoroquinolone topical antibiotic (Moxifloxacin, Vigamox) and topical steroid (Prednisolone Acetate Ophthalmic Suspension, Pred Forte) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-06-01
- Completion
- 2015-11-01
- First posted
- 2015-12-09
- Last updated
- 2015-12-09
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02625467. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.