Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02590757
Comparison of NIV-NAVA vs. N-CPAP After Extubation in Preterm Infants Study
Comparison of Non-invasive Ventilation Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Extubation in Infants' < 30 Weeks of Gestation: Randomized Controlled Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 78 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 2 Days – 6 Weeks
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study is a randomized controlled study to compare if a a non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) is better than nasal continuous positive airway pressure (N-CPAP) after extubation in infants' \< 30 weeks of gestation.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | NIV-NAVA | Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist |
| DEVICE | N-CPAP | Nasal-continuous positive airway pressure |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-12-10
- Primary completion
- 2020-11-13
- Completion
- 2021-01-23
- First posted
- 2015-10-29
- Last updated
- 2021-12-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02590757. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.