Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02421939
A Study of ASP2215 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase (FLT3) Mutation
A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Study of ASP2215 Versus Salvage Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) With FLT3 Mutation
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 371 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical benefit of ASP2215 therapy in participants with FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were refractory to or had relapsed after first-line AML therapy as shown with overall survival (OS) compared to salvage chemotherapy, and determined the efficacy of ASP2215 therapy as assessed by the rate of complete remission and complete remission with partial hematological recovery (CR/CRh) in these participants. This study also determined the overall efficacy in event-free survival (EFS) and complete remission (CR) rate of ASP2215 compared to salvage chemotherapy.
Detailed description
Participants considered an adult according to local regulations at the time of signing informed consent participated in this study. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive ASP2215 or salvage chemotherapy. Participants entered the screening period up to 14 days prior to the start of treatment. Prior to randomization, a salvage chemotherapy regimen was pre-selected for each participant; options included low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC), azacitidine, mitoxantrone, etoposide, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (MEC), or fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). The randomization was stratified by response to first-line therapy and pre-selected salvage chemotherapy. Participants were administered treatment over continuous 28-day cycles. After treatment discontinuation, participants had a pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)/end-of-treatment visit within 7 days after treatment discontinuation, followed by a 30-day follow-up for safety, in which a telephone contact with the participant was sufficient unless any assessment had to be repeated for resolution of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). After that, long term follow-up was done every 3 months up to 3 years from the participant's end-of-treatment visit.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | gilteritinib | tablet, oral |
| DRUG | LoDAC (Low Dose Cytarabine) | subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) injection |
| DRUG | Azacitidine | SC or IV injection |
| DRUG | MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) | IV injection |
| DRUG | FLAG-IDA (Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Idarubicin) | SC (G-CSF) and IV (Fludarabine, Cytarabine, Idarubicin) injection |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-10-20
- Primary completion
- 2018-09-17
- Completion
- 2025-02-25
- First posted
- 2015-04-21
- Last updated
- 2025-12-04
- Results posted
- 2019-10-17
Locations
126 sites across 14 countries: United States, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom
Regulatory
- FDA-regulated drug study
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02421939. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.