Trials / Withdrawn
WithdrawnNCT02355652
Cemented Versus Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty : a Prospective Randomized Study
Comparison of Two Surgical Strategies of Total Knee Arthroplasty : Cemented Versus Uncemented HLS Knee-Tec Prosthesis System. A Prospective Randomized Study.
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 0 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 50 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The goal of this prospective randomized double-blind study is to compare clinical and radiological results of cemented and uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two hundred and fifty patients will be randomized in two groups : cemented TKA and uncemented TKA. The primary outcome is the comparison of the International Knee Society (IKS) Score revised in 2011 at one year postoperative. The second outcome is the comparison of standard one year-postoperative x-rays looking for signs of loosening.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Surgical total knee replacement using cemented components | Each patient of this arm will go under a surgical procedure of total knee replacement (or total knee arthroplasty) using cemented femoral and tibial prosthetic components. |
| DEVICE | Surgical total knee replacement using uncemented components | Each patient of this arm will go under a surgical procedure of total knee replacement (or total knee arthroplasty) using uncemented femoral and tibial prosthetic components. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-01-01
- Completion
- 2017-03-01
- First posted
- 2015-02-04
- Last updated
- 2017-01-06
Locations
1 site across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02355652. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.