Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02226328
Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Midazolam With Fentanyl-sedation for Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized, Single Blind, Controlled Study of Satisfaction and Safety.
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 128 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Flexible bronchoscopy almost always requires sedation to be successful. In order to increase the availability of propofol for sedation, non-anaesthesiologist administered propofol sedation has been suggested as an alternative to traditional midazolam/opioid sedation or the general anaesthesia provided by anaesthesiologists. Hypothesis: Patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy prefers non-anaesthesiologist administered sedation with propofol as opposed to non-anaesthesiologist administered sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Propofol sedation is as safe as midazolam and fentanyl sedation.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Propofol sedation | |
| DRUG | Midazolam and Fentanyl sedation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-12-01
- Completion
- 2016-04-01
- First posted
- 2014-08-27
- Last updated
- 2015-06-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02226328. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.