Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT02226328

Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Midazolam With Fentanyl-sedation for Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized, Single Blind, Controlled Study of Satisfaction and Safety.

Status
Unknown
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128 (estimated)
Sponsor
Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Flexible bronchoscopy almost always requires sedation to be successful. In order to increase the availability of propofol for sedation, non-anaesthesiologist administered propofol sedation has been suggested as an alternative to traditional midazolam/opioid sedation or the general anaesthesia provided by anaesthesiologists. Hypothesis: Patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy prefers non-anaesthesiologist administered sedation with propofol as opposed to non-anaesthesiologist administered sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Propofol sedation is as safe as midazolam and fentanyl sedation.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGPropofol sedation
DRUGMidazolam and Fentanyl sedation

Timeline

Start date
2014-11-01
Primary completion
2015-12-01
Completion
2016-04-01
First posted
2014-08-27
Last updated
2015-06-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Denmark

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02226328. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.