Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02036398
Tubeless Versus Standard Upper Pole Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Comparison of Complications Between Patients Undergoing Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Nephrostomy Tube Placement and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Double J Stent Only Placement
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 75 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Rabin Medical Center · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Comparison of complications between standard upper pole percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with nephrostomy placement and double J stent and PCNL with double J placement only without nephrostomy.
Detailed description
Measurement of complications in and comparison between two groups of patients undergoing upper pole PCNL. First group consists of patients left with nephrostomy and double J stent and the second group includes patients left with double J stent only without nephrostomy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Double J stent without nephrostomy | Double J stent only left at the end of the procedure without placement of a nephrostomy tube |
| DEVICE | nephrostomy tube and double J stent | Double J stent and nephrostomy tube left at end of procedure |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-04-07
- Completion
- 2017-04-07
- First posted
- 2014-01-15
- Last updated
- 2018-11-28
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Israel
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02036398. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.