Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02027038

Pelvic Belt Effects on Osseous Anatomy, Muscule Activation and Ground Reaction Forces

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Leipzig · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Hypothesis I: The anatomic alignment of the pelvic bones, the electromuscular activation of limb muscles and ground reaction forces are different in patients with sacroiliac joint pain, as compared to healthy controls. Hypothesis II: The application of pelvic belts alters the alignment of the pelvic bones, the electromuscular activation of the limb muscles or ground reaction forces. Hypothesis III: The effects proposed in hypothesis II are different in patients with sacroiliac joint pain, as compared to healthy controls.

Detailed description

The sacroiliac joint is among the most frequently involved anatomical structure in low back pain. Pelvic belt anatomy makes the sacroiliac joint more vulnerable to be involved in chronic painful conditions. However, the anatomical and functional correlate of sacroiliac joint pain is yet undetermined. According to the guidelines of International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), painful conditions should primarily be managed conservatively. However, existing studies fail providing sound evidence on the effects of conservative devices to therapy sacroiliac joint pain. In the study, a total of 17 patients suffering from sacroiliac joint pain and 17 controls were investigated by means of magnetic resonance imaging, EMG, health surveys and ground reaction force measurements. A pelvic compression belt was administered in two levels of compression and the corresponding magnetic resonance imaging, EMG and ground reaction force data were measured.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEPelvic belt application

Timeline

Start date
2011-08-01
Primary completion
2012-12-01
Completion
2013-01-01
First posted
2014-01-03
Last updated
2014-01-03

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02027038. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.