Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01920438
Outcome Study of Endoscopically Inserted Gastrostomy (PEG)Versus Radiologically-guided Insertion of Gastrostomy (RIG)in Children
PEG Vs RIG: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Versus Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy in Children
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
A gastrostomy is a feeding tube that communicates from the skin directly into the stomach. It is a device frequently used in children that have feeding difficulties or are unable to maintain normal growth via oral feeds. The same device may be inserted in two ways: the percutaneous endoscopic method (PEG) which is guided by the use of an endoscope (flexible camera), or the radiologically inserted method (RIG) which is guided by the use of X-ray imaging. Both methods of insertion have been used in children for more than 20 years, but it is not clear which is the best method. Both methods are associated with complications, including injury to other abdominal organs and leakage leading to sepsis. There are no randomised controlled trials comparing the two techniques. We aim to compare the outcome of both methods of gastrostomy insertion in children, with emphasis on the complication rates. We have devised a complication score with weightage assigned to each complication according to its severity. A randomised controlled trial will be performed in children requiring a gastrostomy, 100 per group. The primary outcome will be the overall total complication rate.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy | PEG |
| PROCEDURE | Radiologically-guided insertion of Gastrostomy | RIG |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-08-01
- Completion
- 2017-08-01
- First posted
- 2013-08-12
- Last updated
- 2013-08-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01920438. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.