Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01861821

Analgesic Efficacy of a Multiport Versus Uniport Flexible Catheter for Labor Epidural Analgesia

Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Blinded, Single-center Study of the Clinical Efficacy and Outcomes of a Multiport Versus Uniport Flexible Catheter for Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Delivery

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
650 (actual)
Sponsor
Baylor Research Institute · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether multiple ports improve the analgesic efficacy of flexible catheters used for the provision of epidural analgesia during the entire continuum of labor and delivery

Detailed description

Multiport catheters, when compared to uniport catheters, have been associated with better analgesic quality during labor epidural analgesia because the presence of more than one port may enhance the distribution of epidural medication Flexible catheters, when compared to rigid catheters, have been associated with better analgesic quality during labor epidural analgesia because greater flexibility may minimize catheter deviation in the epidural space, facilitate more optimal catheter placement in the epidural space, and result in better distribution of epidural medication It is unknown whether multiple ports, which promote better distribution of epidural medication, provide added analgesic benefit to flexible catheters, which also facilitate better distribution of epidural medication, when used for the provision of epidural analgesia during labor and delivery

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEMultiport flexible catheterMultiport flexible catheter has three ports for the delivery of epidural medication
DEVICEUniport flexible catheterUniport flexible catheter has one port for the delivery of epidural medication

Timeline

Start date
2011-11-01
Primary completion
2013-06-01
Completion
2013-06-01
First posted
2013-05-24
Last updated
2025-10-07

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01861821. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.