Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01861769
Implementation of Evidence-based Psychotherapy for PTSD
Implementation of Evidence-based Psychotherapy for PTSD: An Empirical Investigation of Post-workshop Consultation in Treatment Fidelity and Patient Outcomes
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Toronto Metropolitan University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Approximately 9% of Canadians will have Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in their lifetime. In the military veteran population, the lifetime prevalence of PTSD has been estimated to be as high as 20%. Numerous research studies have demonstrated that short-term, cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies, such as Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), lead to substantial improvements in PTSD symptoms. However, research suggests that a minority of clinicians provide these therapies in clinical settings. The transfer of this research knowledge into clinical settings remains one of the largest hurdles to improving the health of Canadians with PTSD. It is well established that attending a 2-day workshop on these therapies alone is insufficient to promote adequate knowledge transfer and sustained skillful use. The current study aims to contrast whether two forms of post-workshop support (6-month duration), with different levels of expert oversight, will result in superior levels of clinician skill and patient outcomes versus no formal post-workshop support. The three forms of post-workshop support are 1) technology-enhanced group tele-consultation 2) standard group tele-consultation 3) no tele consultation. The primary and secondary outcomes will be the assessment of the clinicians' competence in CPT and patient symptoms,respectively. This study will inform how best to transfer evidence based therapy outcomes to the clinical milieu to attain comparable outcomes as those observed in research. The investigators' hypotheses are as follows: Hypothesis 1:The technology enhanced group tele-consultation condition will evidence the highest levels of fidelity, the standard group tele-consultation condition will evidence intermediate levels of fidelity, and the no-consultation/fidelity monitoring only condition will evidence the lowest fidelity. Hypothesis 2: Fidelity to the CPT protocol, irrespective of consultation condition, will be positively associated with improved client outcomes. Hypothesis 3: Organizational context variables, such as the organizational climate and readiness for change, will influence the uptake of CPT skills, as well as the extent to which these skills are utilized in practice.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Technology-enhanced Teleconsultation | Technology-enhanced Group Tele-consultation. This consultation method requires that participants be prepared to review and receive feedback on audiorecorded CPT sessions in a group format. The CPT expert randomly selects two clinician sessions each week that have been audiorecorded to use for feedback and discussion in group teleconference based on procedures used in previous training initiatives (Stirman, Bhar, et al., 2010). Five- to twenty-minute segments of the two sessions will be shared within the group consultation. The CPT expert will provide feedback on the sessions with an emphasis on review of key learning points. These consultation group sessions will be facilitated with collaborative meeting software that includes audio file uploading. |
| OTHER | Standard Teleconsultation | Standard Tele-consultation Group. The CPT expert will randomly select clinicians for case presentation each week. Each clinician will be responsible for verbally presenting on their CPT cases throughout the 6-month period of consultation course. No audiorecorded content will be reviewed within the calls. All other procedures used in the above condition will be used here. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-10-01
- Completion
- 2014-10-01
- First posted
- 2013-05-24
- Last updated
- 2014-11-04
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01861769. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.