Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01816568

The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50 (actual)
Sponsor
Maltepe University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intrabdominal surgery with minimal trauma. In numerous studies, when conventional laparoscopic appendectomy using 3 ports is compared with open appendectomy, it has advantages of reduced pain, reduced hospital stay, and enhanced cosmetic effects. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study the investigators aimed to compare results of SILS appendectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic appendectomy prospectively.

Detailed description

Total of 50 patients who undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis will randomly assign to undergo SILS appendectomy group (n = 25) or Three port laparoscopic appendectomy group (n= 25) according to a computer-generated table of random numbers. Demographics (ie, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, need for conversion to a standard or three port laparoscopic appendectomy, need for conversion to an open appendectomy will be recorded. Outcome measures include operative morbidity, operative time, pain score, hospital stay. Morbidity will be evaluated by rates of colonic leak, wound infection, intrabdominal abscess hospital readmission, and hernia.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESILS appendectomySingle incision laparoscopic appendectomy will be performed
PROCEDUREThree port laparoscopic appendectomyThree port laparoscopic appendectomy will be performed

Timeline

Start date
2010-02-01
Primary completion
2013-02-01
Completion
2013-02-01
First posted
2013-03-22
Last updated
2013-03-22

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01816568. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.