Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01773447
Set-back Suture Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress Suture
Comparing Wound Eversion and Clinical Outcomes in Surgical Wound Repair With Subcuticular Set-back Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress Suturing Techniques
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 47 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- University of California, Davis · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators hope to compare two different methods of closing skin wounds using sutures. One of these methods (the set-back technique) was recently described in 2010 and has been reported to be technically easier and reduces the chance of spitting sutures (deep sutures that are pushed to the surface of the skin as the wound heals). The other method (the vertical mattress technique) has been used for many years with good results. However, no controlled studies have been performed to clearly demonstrate a difference between the two methods. We hope to find differences in the height of the wound edges immediately after surgery(5 minutes following the procedure) as well as the appearance of the scar and symptoms associated with the scar 3 months after surgery.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Set-back suture | |
| PROCEDURE | Vertical mattress suture |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-03-01
- Completion
- 2014-04-01
- First posted
- 2013-01-23
- Last updated
- 2017-03-31
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01773447. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.