Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01742494
Comparison Study of Conventional POEM and Hybrid POEM for Esophageal Achalasia
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Randomized Comparison of Water-Jet Assisted Versus Conventional Dissection Technique
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been introduced as promising alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for patients with idiopathic achalasia. Several technical modifications have been proposed but have not yet been tested in randomized trials.
Detailed description
Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of water-jet assisted POEM (WJ) versus the conventional technique (C). Interventions: Patients with achalasia diagnosed by symptoms, endoscopy and barium swallow eligible for POEM were randomized to either the use of Erbe Hybrid knife (WJ group) or the conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife interchangeably (C group). Main outcome measurements: Procedure time in both groups; secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy and safety (bleeding complications, pneumothorax or pleural effusion requiring intervention)
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Water-jet POEM | Water-jet assisted POEM procedure was performed |
| PROCEDURE | Conventional POEM | POEM were performed by the use of conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-04-01
- Completion
- 2012-12-01
- First posted
- 2012-12-05
- Last updated
- 2012-12-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01742494. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.