Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT01742494

Comparison Study of Conventional POEM and Hybrid POEM for Esophageal Achalasia

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: Randomized Comparison of Water-Jet Assisted Versus Conventional Dissection Technique

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100 (estimated)
Sponsor
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has recently been introduced as promising alternative to laparoscopic Heller myotomy for patients with idiopathic achalasia. Several technical modifications have been proposed but have not yet been tested in randomized trials.

Detailed description

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of water-jet assisted POEM (WJ) versus the conventional technique (C). Interventions: Patients with achalasia diagnosed by symptoms, endoscopy and barium swallow eligible for POEM were randomized to either the use of Erbe Hybrid knife (WJ group) or the conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife interchangeably (C group). Main outcome measurements: Procedure time in both groups; secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy and safety (bleeding complications, pneumothorax or pleural effusion requiring intervention)

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREWater-jet POEMWater-jet assisted POEM procedure was performed
PROCEDUREConventional POEMPOEM were performed by the use of conventional technique using injection and triangle tip knife.

Timeline

Start date
2011-08-01
Primary completion
2012-04-01
Completion
2012-12-01
First posted
2012-12-05
Last updated
2012-12-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01742494. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.