Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT01701297

VSL#3 and Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

The Effect of Probiotics on the Incidence of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients With Cirrhosis and Ascites

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10 (actual)
Sponsor
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Research question: Do oral probiotics in patients with cirrhosis and ascites reduce intestinal bacterial concentrations, ascitic bacterial DNA, SBP and bacteraemia compared to antibiotics or placebo? This study is designed to investigate the effects of an oral probiotic (VSL#3; a mixture of "healthy" bacteria for the intestines) compared to an antibiotic or placebo in preventing infection developing in the abdominal fluid ("ascites") that collects in patients with advanced liver disease ("cirrhosis"). Patients already having had infection will be excluded from the study. Clear inclusion and exclusion criteria will be met and patients will be monitored throughout the study to examine whether they have required more hospitalisations, their rate infection in abdominal fluid or elsewhere and the level of liver function.

Detailed description

The prevalence of cirrhosis is increasing in the UK. Decompensation heralds a poor outcome, with mortality in those developing ascites approximately 50% over the following 1-2 years. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in ascitic fluid further reduces survival and occurs due to a combination of increased intestinal epithelial dysfunction, bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes and ascitic fluid, and reduced opsonisation and neutrophil function. Even with antibiotic treatment, 3-month mortality from SBP is approximately 40% and results in expensive in-patient care. Several studies have confirmed the benefit of secondary prophylaxis with long-term oral antibiotics in patients with advanced liver disease (e.g. norfloxacin, co-trimoxazole) and others suggest that in patients at high risk of developing SBP, primary antibiotic prophylaxis improves rates of sepsis and survival. Problems with these strategies include emergence of bacterial resistance, and development of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (including C. difficile infection, which has a high case-fatality rate in those with cirrhosis). Local bacterial resistance profiles and association with C. difficile infection favour the choice of co-trimoxazole in our study population. Patients with advanced cirrhosis taking co-trimoxazole have previously demonstrated reduced liver-related outcomes such as infection and death3. Probiotic preparations alter intestinal bacterial flora and improve intestinal barrier and neutrophil function. Faecal bacterial counts of E. coli and Streptococcus (organisms commonly responsible for SBP) showed a 2-log fall with probiotics, although whether they could reduce the incidence of SBP remains unexamined.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGcotrimoxazoleCotrimoxazole 960mg orally each day (two 480mg tablets)
DRUGVSL#3 activeThe prescribed dose was 2 sachets (containing 900 billion bacteria) orally each day for 48 weeks
DRUGVSL#3 placeboThis was two placebo sachets identical to VSL#3 active sachet. The prescribed dose was 2 sachets orally each day for 48 weeks

Timeline

Start date
2012-02-01
Primary completion
2014-10-01
Completion
2014-10-01
First posted
2012-10-05
Last updated
2016-10-28

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01701297. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.