Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01635439

Prostin and Propess in Induction of Labor

Induction of Labour: A Comparison Between Propess Vaginal Delivery System and Prostin E2 Vaginal Suppositories, A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200 (actual)
Sponsor
Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years – 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two agents used in induction of labor Propess (Controlled release dinoprostone, PGE2, pessary) and Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone vaginal Tablet).

Detailed description

A controlled release hydrophilic matrix (Controlled Therapeutics Ltd., East Kilbride, Scotland) which provides a gradual release of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) was introduced in 1995 (Propess, Ferring Pharmaceuticals). This preparation is used for the initiation or enhancement of cervical ripening in women at or after term with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation. Prostaglandin E2 causes softening and dilatation of the cervix and subsequently produces uterine contractions which may induce labour.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGPropessThe vaginal insert is removed 24 h after the application. It is only to be removed earlier in case of the onset of active labour, the rupture of the membranes, or at the occurrence of hyperstimulation.
DRUGProstin E23 mg tab is placed in the posterior vaginal fornix. dose can be repeated every 6 hours till onset of active labour, the rupture of the membranes, or the occurrence of hyper-stimulation.

Timeline

Start date
2010-12-01
Primary completion
2011-11-01
Completion
2011-12-01
First posted
2012-07-09
Last updated
2014-02-06
Results posted
2012-10-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Saudi Arabia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01635439. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.