NCT01604668

Comparative Accuracy of Three Versions of Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring

Comparative Accuracy of Three Versions of Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring.

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 10 (actual)
• Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

There is no study hypothesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the: 1) SpHb (Radical 7 Pulse Co-Oximetry with SpHb™) RevF sensor (currently marketed), 2) the SpHb RevG sensor (a new, limited release version), and 3) the Pronto-7 sensor (currently marketed version) in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the: 1) SpHb RevF sensor (currently marketed), 2) the SpHb RevG sensor (a new, limited release version), and 3) the Pronto-7 sensor (currently marketed version) in patients undergoing spine surgery. The results from the three sensors will be compared to a blood hemoglobin level taken intermittently (as a function of the patient's anesthesia care) and analyzed in the UCSF Clinical Laboratories. This is an observational study.

Conditions

• Blood Loss

Timeline

• Start date: 2012-05-01
• Primary completion: 2013-05-01
• Completion: 2013-05-01
• First posted: 2012-05-24
• Last updated: 2013-08-21

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States