Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01553383
Comparison of Nasal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Valve to Dental Device as an Alternative Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Comparison of Nasal Positive End Expiratory Pressure Valve to Dental Device as an Alternative Treatment for OSA
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 200 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Determine the clinical efficacy in terms of Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), nocturnal oxygenation of a nasal Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) valve "Provent" in obstructive sleep apnea. The hypothesis is the efficacy will be better than dental device.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | nasal peep valve "Provent" | application of nasal peep valve vs dental device and cpap |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-03-01
- Completion
- 2013-03-01
- First posted
- 2012-03-14
- Last updated
- 2013-04-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Hong Kong
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01553383. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.