Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01515397
Comparison of Two Gelatine Solutions
Efficacy and Safety of a Balanced Gelatine Solution in Combination With a Balanced Electrolyte Solution Versus a Standard Gelatine Solution in Combination With a Non-balanced Electrolyte Solution in Patients Scheduled for Abdominal Surgery
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (actual)
- Sponsor
- B. Braun Melsungen AG · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of volume replacement is to compensate a reduction in the intravascular volume e.g. during surgery and to counteract hypovolemia in order to maintain hemodynamics and vital functions. To achieve this, different plasma substitutes are available: Albumin, dextran, hydroxyethylstarches and gelatine. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that acid-base alterations during elective abdominal surgery can be reduced by the use of a new gelatine solution.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Gelofusine balanced | Gelofusine balanced combined with Sterofundin ISO |
| DRUG | Gelofusine 4% | Gelofusine 4% combined with NaCl 0.9% |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-12-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-01-01
- Completion
- 2013-01-01
- First posted
- 2012-01-24
- Last updated
- 2013-11-27
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01515397. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.