Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01475071
Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses
Intra-individual Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Galderma R&D · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of Metvix® natural daylight photodynamic therapy with those of Metvix® conventional photodynamic therapy with Aktilite™ lamp in subjects with mild actinic keratoses (intra-individual comparison).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Metvix and natural daylight PDT | Methyl aminolevulinate, cream 160mg/g.One session at baseline and a second session administration at week 12 for lesions showing non-complete response and new lesions on target area. |
| DRUG | Metvix and conventional PDT | Methyl aminolevulinate, cream, 160mg/g. One session at baseline and a second session administration at week 12 for lesions showing non-complete response and new lesions on target area. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-11-01
- Completion
- 2013-03-01
- First posted
- 2011-11-21
- Last updated
- 2021-02-18
- Results posted
- 2016-04-18
Locations
6 sites across 1 country: Australia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01475071. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.