Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01447277
Prospective Femoral Versus Femoral and Sciatic Nerve Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction
The Addition of a Preoperative Sciatic Nerve Block to a Femoral Nerve Block for Ambulatory Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 68 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators propose that a preoperative femoral and sciatic blocks vs a femoral block only, prior to ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction will lead to a decrease in opiate consumption, pain scores, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay. The investigators are prospectively randomizing patients to either a femoral or a fem/sciatic block and monitor outcomes.
Detailed description
Although femoral nerve blocks improve analgesia after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, patients often complain of posterior knee pain, which can be treated with a sciatic nerve block. In a prospective randomized study, we compare preoperative femoral nerve block to a combined femoral and sciatic block in patients undergoing ambulatory ACL reconstruction. We hypothesize that the combined femoral/sciatic nerve block patients would have improved analgesia, fewer opioid-related side effects, and shorter PACU length of stay and improved patient satisfaction.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Sciatic Block | Performing a sciatic block in addition to a femoral block preoperatively |
| PROCEDURE | Femoral Block only | Performing a preoperative sciatic nerve block only |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-05-01
- Completion
- 2013-06-01
- First posted
- 2011-10-06
- Last updated
- 2020-02-21
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01447277. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.