Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Withdrawn

WithdrawnNCT01277874

Oscillatory Versus Non-Oscillatory Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure Neonatal Respiratory Support

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Utah · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
28 Days
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This study will seek to enroll neonates requiring Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure (NCPAP) respiratory support and randomize them to either oscillatory (Osc-NCPAP, study group) or non-oscillatory (NCPAP, control group) mode. The goal of the research is to determine if Osc-NCPAP provides improved ventilation support compared to routine NCPAP, i.e. NCPAP without oscillations. This will be measured by need for change to ventilator support, improvement in pCO2 values, and reduction in respiratory rate and frequency of apnea during the period of NCPAP treatment. Other respiratory outcomes will also be compared, including time on NCPAP, time on High-Flow Nasal Cannula support following NCPAP, and time-averaged PiO2 from start of study to end of respiratory treatment.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICENasal CPAPNCPAP is delivered via nasal prongs placed into infant's nares. It may be delivered via ventilator or by bubble.
DEVICEOscillatory NCPAPBird Industries pneumatic diaphragm is attached to NCPAP patient circuit to provide oscillations.

Timeline

Start date
2014-12-01
Primary completion
2017-04-01
Completion
2017-04-01
First posted
2011-01-17
Last updated
2017-03-13

Locations

3 sites across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01277874. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.