Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01239940
RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent)
RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent). A Prospective, Multicenter and Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 310 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Fundación Médica para la Investigación y Desarrollo en el Area Cardiovascular · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis remains a challenge. This study will assess which interventional strategy (paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent) is superior in the treatment of patients suffering from drug-eluting stent restenosis.
Detailed description
Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis remains a major clinical and technical challenge. Currently, drug-eluting stents are widely used in the management of these patients. Recently, the value of the paclitaxel-eluting balloon in this clinical setting has been suggested. However, there is only scarce observational data on the value of this new balloon in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial will compare two different interventional strategies (namely, paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs everolimus-eluting stent) in the treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-eluting balloon | Balloon angioplasty |
| DEVICE | Coronary angioplasty using the Everolimus-eluting stent | Stent implantation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-07-01
- First posted
- 2010-11-15
- Last updated
- 2011-06-27
Locations
25 sites across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01239940. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.