Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT01205841

A Prospective Study Comparing Different Clinical Decision Rules in Adult and Pediatric Ankle Trauma

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,500 (estimated)
Sponsor
KU Leuven · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
5 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Comparison of the reliability of different examination techniques to detect fractures in patients with ankle trauma.

Detailed description

Patients with ankle trauma frequently present in the emergency department. In many institutions radiographies of the ankle and foot are obtained in most of these patients, although significant fractures occur only in 15%. Therefore clinical decision rules were developed to clinically rule out significant ankle fractures, thereby reducing the number of radiographies resulting in significant time and cost savings. Up until now the Ottawa Ankle and Foot Rules are the only clinical decision rules for ankle trauma that are widely accepted. They have a high sensitivity for the detection of fractures but a relatively low specificity. This led to the development of alternative clinical decision rules claiming equally high sensitivity but improved specificity. These alternatives have mostly not been replicated nor have they been directly compared. This is what the researchers want to do in this study: compare different clinical decision rules regarding sensitivity and specificity. Radiographies of ankle and foot made for every patient are used as the gold standard for the detection of fractures. Different clinical decision rules will be compared in a pediatric (5-15 years) and an adult population (from 16 years onwards). The researchers consider a clinical decision rule acceptable of it has a sensitivity of at least 95% and a specificity of at least 25%.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREOttawa Ankle and Foot RulesAs previously published
PROCEDUREBuffalo RuleAs previously published
PROCEDUREOttawa Ankle and Foot Rules + application of a tuning fork to the distal fibula and tibiaAs previously published
PROCEDUREThompson TestAs previously published
PROCEDUREPalpation of the fibulaPalpation of the fibula over its entire length.
PROCEDUREOttawa Ankle and Foot Rules + palpation of the cuboid boneAs previously published
PROCEDUREOttawa Ankle and Foot Rules + palpation over the deltoid ligamentAs previously published
PROCEDUREMalleolar Zone AlgorithmAs previously published
PROCEDURELow Risk ExamAs previously published
PROCEDUREBernese Ankle RulesAs previously published
PROCEDUREOttawa Ankle and Foot Rules + swelling of the distal fibulaAs previously published

Timeline

Start date
2010-09-01
Primary completion
2012-08-01
Completion
2012-08-01
First posted
2010-09-21
Last updated
2010-09-21

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Belgium

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01205841. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.