Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01189162
High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (NIMV)for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS): a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study
High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation for Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 80 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Bnai Zion Medical Center · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 1 Minute
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators hypothesize that while the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants (\<1000 g) may need NIMV for the treatment of RDS, larger infants or the smaller ones post extubation may enjoy the comfort benefits associated with HFNC while getting coparable respiratory support to NIMV.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | NIMV with SLE ventilator vs HFNC via Vapotherm | Nasal respiratory support for RDS |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-07-01
- Completion
- 2016-07-01
- First posted
- 2010-08-26
- Last updated
- 2015-08-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Israel
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01189162. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.