NCT01075620

Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of Nonposterior- and Posterior-Stabilized Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized Study

• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 126 (actual)
• Sponsor: Ewha Womans University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 30 Years – 90 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or radiographic differences in non-posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing design versus a posterior stabilized rotating mobile bearing designs.

Detailed description

Out comes measures were to determine 1. whether the knee and function scores and the radiographic results of the knees with a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis would be better than those with an LCS RP prosthesis. 2. whether the patients with a PFC RP knee prosthesis would have a better range of knee motion than those with an LCS RP prosthesis. 3. whether patient satisfaction and preference would be better in the patients having a PFC Sigma RP knee prosthesis than those of patients having an LCS RP knee prosthesis 4. whether complication rate would be less in the knees with a PFC sigma RP knee prosthesis than in the knees with an LCS RP prosthesis.

Conditions

• Osteoarthritis

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	PFC-Sigma RP	Posterior stabilizing rotating platform total knee components
DEVICE	LPS RP	non-posterior stabilized rotating platform design

Timeline

• Start date: 2002-05-01
• Primary completion: 2002-12-01
• Completion: 2010-01-01
• First posted: 2010-02-25
• Last updated: 2010-02-25

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea