Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00956683
Dual Endpoint Nerve Stimulation Versus Ultrasound in Infraclavicular Block for Hand Surgery
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Dual Endpoint Nerve Stimulation With Ultrasound-guided Infraclavicular Block for Hand Surgery.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 106 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Current best practice for performance of infraclavicular block dictates the use of a dual-endpoint nerve stimulation technique that still only results in a 79% success rate. Use of an ultrasound-guided technique has the potential to significantly improve success. A randomized, controlled study to evaluate this area remains to be performed and is required to demonstrate to anesthesiologists that an ultrasound-guided approach should supersede nerve stimulation as the technique of choice for infraclavicular block.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Nerve Block | Use of Ultrasound to help guide needle placement and local anesthetic injection during infraclavicular nerve block. |
| PROCEDURE | Dual-Endpoint nerve stimulation | Use of dual-endpoint nerve stimulation to guide needle placement and local anesthetic injection during infraclavicular nerve block. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2006-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2008-08-01
- Completion
- 2008-12-01
- First posted
- 2009-08-11
- Last updated
- 2009-08-11
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00956683. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.