Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00917774
A Gender-Specific Posterior Cruciate-Substituting High-Flexion Knee Prosthesis Does Not Improve Fit and Function
A Gender-Specific Posterior Cruciate-Substituting High-Flexion Knee Prosthesis Does Not Improve Fit and Function Compared With a Standard Posterior Cruciate-Substituting High-Flexion Knee Prostheis A Prospective, Randomized Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 88 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Ewha Womans University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare functional and radiographic results, range of motion of the knee, patient satisfaction, femoral component, revision and complication rates in patients receiving either a standard posterior cruciate substituting-flex (LPS-flex) or gender-specific posterior cruciate substituting-flex (LPS-Flex) total knee prosthesis.
Detailed description
Recently much debate and discussion has focused on the effect of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare functional and radiographic results, range of motion of the knee, patient satisfaction, femoral component, revision and complication rates in patients receiving either a standard posterior cruciate substituting-flex (LPS-flex) or gender-specific posterior cruciate substituting-flex (LPS-Flex) total knee prosthesis.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Standard LPS flex TKA | TKA by Standard LPS flex TKA |
| DEVICE | Gender specific LPS -Flex TKA | Total knee design created specific for female patients |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2006-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2007-01-01
- Completion
- 2009-05-01
- First posted
- 2009-06-10
- Last updated
- 2009-06-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00917774. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.