Trials / Withdrawn
WithdrawnNCT00734812
Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
LSH vs. TLH, A Randomized Single Blind Trial
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 0 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate whether there is any difference in recovery time and return to normal activities following a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) compared with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Both types of hysterectomies are commonly performed at our institution. Patients will be assigned by chance (like a coin toss) to have either a LSH or a TLH. Preoperatively, participants will complete a quality of life questionnaire (SF-36), a sexual function questionnaire (FSFI)and a 3 question questionnaire about urinary function (3IQ). Following surgery participants will be asked to keep a diary of pain symptoms and use of narcotics. The diary will be filled out daily until patients have resumed normal activities from prior to the surgery. The SF-36 will be completed again 6 weeks following the original surgery. 6 months following surgery participants will receive a copy of the SF-36 and the FSFI in the mail. They will also be asked questions about urinary symptoms and persistent vaginal bleeding.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy | Patients will be randomized to LSH (retaining the cervix) and TLH (cervix removal) |
| PROCEDURE | Total laparoscopic hysterectomy | Patients will be randomized to either removal or retention of cervix |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2008-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-01-01
- Completion
- 2012-01-01
- First posted
- 2008-08-14
- Last updated
- 2013-01-24
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00734812. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.